Agenda and minutes

To receive apologies for absence and note substitutions.

Members who are unable to attend this meeting must submit apologies by the end of 2^nd January 2023 to enable a substitute to be arranged, if applicable.

Apologies were received from Cllrs Jon Heagin and Michaela Wicks. Cllr Sally Dickson attended via Zoom.

To receive from Members declarations of interests in relation to any items included on the agenda for this meeting, in accordance with Waverley’s Code of Local Government.

There were no declarations of interest submitted for this meeting.

The Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) has been produced as part of our statutory duties required by the Local Air Quality Management framework. It outlines the action we will take to improve air quality in Waverley between 2023 and 2028. The Clean Air  Strategy will provide a mechanism for reducing emissions further than our statutory requirements, whilst supporting measures highlighted in the ASR, and will outline how we plan to effectively tackle air quality issues across the borough.

Link to the Consultation: Waverley Borough Council - Air Quality Action Plan and Clean Air Strategy consultation

Recommendation

To note and make comments on the draft Air Quality Action Plan and the Draft Clean Air Strategy.

Richard Homewood and Clare Beattie, AQ Consultants attended for this item.

Richard introduced the reports advising that the Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) was produced as part of our statutory duties required by the Local Air Quality Management framework. He highlighted that there had been only marginal exceedances in 2019 onwards.

Clare Beattie gave an outline on the background and context of the AQAP and Clean Air Strategy.  She explained the AQAP was a statutory process with set out criteria.  There were currently an air quality management area in both Godalming and Farnham and the Clean Air Strategy was developed to provide a more flexible approach.

7 categories had been identified where actions are needed to influence improvement in air quality and from these 16 ‘commitments’ were proposed.  The committee requested that the timescales for these commitments be target dates rather than generic short/medium/long term’.

Concern was raised that many of the commitments were nebulous with so many others involved in their success that it would be difficult for us to control. Clare Beattie advised there was a steering group set up which would look at the impact of others.

Members asked how these actions would be funded and were advised that the report would go to the Executive who would then determine the funding. The strategy would then be monitored by the Climate Emergency Board on behalf of the Executive and progress reports would be submitted to this O & S Committee.

The Committee were advised that DEFRA grants cover projects relating to air quality and reducing pollutants and WBC have a bid as part of SCC. Richard advised that  grants had previously been made around work with schools and the most recent is for promoting electric taxis.

It was agreed the two documents were well presented but that the fact remained that there was little WBC could do to force change by others in situations where thresholds were not being exceeded and we needed some ‘teeth’ to address the issues.

Officers were asked why there was no mention in the action plan on how to quantify the ‘uncertainty’ and they would welcome some narrative around this to be included.

Members commented that apart from the relatively narrow scope of the AQAP which Waverley is addressing positively, the council has very few legal instruments at its disposal. The Clean Air Strategy, if it is to have any practical effect, needs a sustained and vigorous publicity campaign to persuade our residents to change some of their habits in areas such as avoiding diesel cars, switching to electric vehicles, not having bonfires and many others. The council needs to take a political, member-led view on how seriously to take this issue.

Officers were asked what powers we had around Bonfires and were advised that there was smoke nuisance legislation but it had to be proved a statutory nuisance for this to be used. Traffic was a more significant polluter than bonfires.

The Committee were also keen to look at illnesses caused by  ...  view the full minutes text for item 38.