Issue - meetings

Contractual Dispute Resolution and Request for Budget Virement

Meeting: 27/03/2019 - Executive (Item 95)

95 Contractual Dispute Resolution and Request for Budget Virement pdf icon PDF 80 KB

This report outlines the contractual dispute that has arisen relating to the construction of the Memorial Hall, Babbs Mead, West Street, Farnham following practical completion of the building which was achieved on 29 August 2018.

 

The Council had been in the process of questioning the Extensions of Time awarded on this contract by Lytle Associates, the appointed Contract Administrator.  At the end of January 2019, Armfield Construction Ltd submitted an inflated interim account, application no. 26, for work on the Hall.

 

On 19 February 2019, an Adjudication Referral Notice was received by the Council from Armfield Construction Ltd (ACL) regarding alleged non-payment of their payment application.

 

This report advises the Executive on the options that result from the Adjudication process and recommends a course of action to resolve this matter, with a virement decision as a financial solution.

 

Recommendation

 

That the Executive:

 

1.         Authorises officers to finalise and settle the negotiated settlement with Armfield Construction Ltd on the broad terms set out in this report, with the agreement of the detailed legal documents delegated to the Section 151 Officer and Portfolio Holder for Finance in consultation with the Borough Solicitor; and

 

2.         in accordance with Waverley’s approved scheme of virement, agrees to vire £375,000 of capital budget from the Frensham project to the Memorial Hall capital scheme budget to meet the unbudgeted contractor cost resulting from this settlement.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

95.1    The Executive received a report outlining the contractual dispute that had arisen relating to the construction of the Memorial Hall, Babbs Mead, West Street, Farnham following practical completion of the building. The report advised Members on the options that resulted from the adjudication process and recommended a course of action to resolve this matter, with a virement decision as a financial solution.

 

95.2    On 12 October 2016, the Council, entered into a JCT Standard Building Contact with Armfield Construction Limited (ACL). The work was administered, from a project view point by an external Contract Administrator, Lytle Associates. A Quantity Surveyors service was bought in from Michael Edwards Consultants Limited (MEA). The works were commenced on 5 September 2016. There were significant delays throughout the project and the works were certified for Practical Completion on 29 August 2018, nearly a year late. There was now a disagreement between the Council and ACL as to where the responsibility for that delay lay. The report detailed the reasons behind the delays and the extension of times.

 

95.3    The report detailed the two options available to the Council as follows:

 

·                     Allow the Adjudication to continue

·                     Negotiate a “without prejudice” settlement with ACL

 

95.4    And, the report outlined the pros and cons of both with the preferred option being the agreement of a negotiated settlement which offered the best possible and most proportionate course of action in this situation.

 

95.5    Following the presentation of the report from Councillor Ged Hall, Councillor Jenny Else as the other responsible portfolio holder, agreed that she fully endorsed the recommendations in the report. Accordingly 

 

The Executive RESOLVED:

 

1.         To authorise officers to finalise and settle the negotiated settlement with Armfield Construction Ltd on the broad terms set out in the report, with the agreement of the detailed legal documents delegated to the Section 151 Officer and Portfolio Holder for Finance in consultation with the Borough Solicitor; and

 

2.         in accordance with Waverley’s approved scheme of virement, to vire £375,000 of capital budget from the Frensham project to the Memorial Hall capital scheme budget to meet the unbudgeted contractor cost resulting from this settlement.

 

[VALUE FOR MONEY AND CUSTOMER SERVICE OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE]

 

[Reason: To consider options that resulted from the Adjudication process and agree a course of action to resolve the matter in relation to the Memorial Hall contractual dispute, with a virement decision as a financial solution].